| |
INTRODUCTION TO THE COURSE |
| |
·
Introduction of faculty & students |
| |
·
Course objectives |
| |
·
Materials & teaching methods |
| |
·
Schedule and assignments for the week |
| |
·
Time management for the week |
| |
·
Apportionment of students into small groups for
training on Monday, Tuesday & Wednesday |
| |
|
| |
SELECTING THE ARBITRATOR, ARRANGING THE
HEARING & HEARING PROCEDURES |
| |
·
Forms of arbitration tribunals |
| |
·
Methods of selecting arbitrators |
| |
·
Arbitration agency procedures |
| |
·
Statutory arbitration procedures |
| |
·
Aids in selecting arbitrators |
| |
·
Pre-hearing communications with the arbitrator |
| |
·
Arranging dates and locations for the arbitration |
| |
·
Using court reporters |
| |
·
Sequence of the hearing |
| |
|
| |
PREPARING THE CASE FOR ARBITRATION |
| |
·
Determining Arbitrability |
| |
·
Review and study of the union’s grievance documents |
| |
·
Review and study of employer’s responses |
| |
·
Interviewing witnesses |
| |
·
Obtaining documents & other evidence |
| |
·
Determining theory of the case |
| |
·
Preparing proposed issues |
| |
·
Determining evidence & witnesses to use |
| |
·
Witness preparation & problem witnesses |
| |
·
Order of proofs |
| |
·
Joint exhibits |
| |
·
Preparing stipulations |
| |
·
Preparing the Trial Notebook |
| |
|
| |
EVIDENCE IN ARBITRATION PROCEEDINGS |
| |
·
Types of evidence: testimony, real & demonstrative |
| |
·
Relevancy, materiality & competency of evidence |
| |
·
Foundations for admission of certain types of evidence |
| |
·
How to introduce evidence |
| |
·
Direct evidence |
| |
·
Circumstantial evidence |
| |
·
Affidavits and depositions |
| |
·
Inspections and views |
| |
·
Admissions against interest |
| |
·
Offers of compromise |
| |
·
Evidence obtained in violation of law |
| |
·
Violations of statutes |
| |
·
Hearsay evidence |
| |
·
Public documents & records |
| |
·
Demonstrative exhibits |
| |
·
Telephone testimony |
| |
·
Obtaining evidence on cross examination |
| |
|
| |
INDIVIDUAL PREPARATION FOR OPENING STATEMENT
& DIRECT EXAMINATION EXERCISES FOR DAY 2 |
| |
·
Students prepare opening statements and direct
examination. |
| |
·
Faculty is available for individualized assistance |
| |
|
|
TUESDAY (DAY 2) |
| |
|
| |
OBJECTIONS |
| |
·
Purpose of objections |
| |
·
How to make objections |
| |
·
When to make objections |
| |
·
Objections to leading questions |
| |
·
Objections to argumentative questions |
| |
·
Objections to confusing questions |
| |
·
Objections to unintelligible questions |
| |
·
Objections to assuming facts not in evidence |
| |
·
Objections to previously asked & answered questions |
| |
·
Objections to beyond the scope questions |
| |
·
Objections to impeaching one’s own witness |
| |
·
Objections to hearsay questions |
| |
·
Objections to relevancy & materiality |
| |
·
Objections based on best evidence rule |
| |
·
Objections to questions seeking conclusions |
| |
·
Objections to documents |
| |
·
Objections to qualifications of the witness |
| |
·
Objections to expert witness testimony |
| |
·
Objections to lay opinion testimony |
| |
·
Objections to non-responsive answers |
| |
·
Objections to prejudicial questions |
| |
·
Objections to improper conduct of witnesses, opposing
advocate or arbitrator |
| |
|
| |
OPENING STATEMENT EXERCISES
|
| |
·
Faculty presentation on purposes and techniques of
opening statements. |
| |
·
Each student presents an opening statement & is
individually critiqued by a faculty member |
| |
|
| |
DIRECT EXAMINATION EXERCISES |
| |
·
Faculty presentation on purposes and techniques of
direct examination. |
| |
·
Each student conducts a direct examination of a witness
and is individually critiqued by a faculty member. (Professional
witnesses are provided) |
| |
|
| |
THE “JUST CAUSE” CONCEPT AND THE “DOUGLAS
STANDARDS” |
| |
·
Faculty presentation on the “Just Cause” concept and
the “Douglas Standards” as they are applied to discipline & discharge
cases. |
| |
·
Students learn how to advocate these concepts in cases. |
| |
|
| |
INDIVIDUAL PREPARATION FOR CROSS-EXAMINATION
AND FINAL ARGUMENT EXERCISES FOR DAY 3 |
| |
·
Students prepare for cross-examination and final
argument. |
| |
·
Faculty is available for individualized instruction. |
| |
|
|
WEDNESDAY
(DAY 3) |
| |
|
| |
CROSS-EXAMINATION EXERCISES
|
| |
·
Faculty presentation on purposes and techniques of
cross-examination |
| |
·
Each student conducts a cross-examination of a witness
and is individually critiqued by a faculty member. (Professional
witnesses are provided) |
| |
|
| |
FINAL ARGUMENT EXERCISES |
| |
·
Faculty presentation on purposes and techniques of
final argument. |
| |
·
Each student presents a final argument and is
individually critiqued by a faculty member. |
| |
|
| |
GENERAL SESSION |
| |
·
All students and faculty meet in joint session to
facilitate preparations for actual arbitration case on Thursday (day 4). |
| |
|
| |
ARBITRATION CASE PREPARATION TIME |
| |
·
Students prepare a complete arbitration case for
presentation to a labor arbitrator on Thursday (day 4). |
| |
·
Faculty members are available to provide individualized
instruction and assistance as needed. |
| |
|
|
THURSDAY (DAY 4) |
| |
|
| |
ARBITRATION PRESENTATIONS |
| |
·
Students present arbitration cases to labor
arbitrators. |
| |
·
Arbitrators follow actual case procedures.
|
| |
·
Student presentations are monitored by faculty member.
|
| |
|
| |
ARBITRATION PRESENTATIONS (CONTINUED) |
| |
·
Students continue presentations of cases to labor
arbitrators. |
| |
·
Arbitrators continue to follow actual case procedures |
| |
·
Students presentations are monitored by faculty member. |
| |
|
| |
RECEPTION FOR STUDENTS, ARBITRATORS & FACULTY |
| |
·
Students meet with arbitrators and faculty in a social
gathering. |
| |
|
|
FRIDAY (DAY 5) |
| |
|
| |
GENERAL SESSION |
| |
·
Students meet with faculty for a general session. |
| |
|
| |
ARBITRATOR CRITIQUES AND AWARDS |
| |
·
Students are individually critiqued by the arbitrators
before whom they appeared as advocates. |
| |
·
Arbitrators will provide insight about the advocate’s
demonstrated skills, strengths, and ways to improve their presentations. |
| |
·
Arbitrators provide an oral award in each of the cases
presented to them and give the reasons for their awards. |
| |
·
Students are able to ask in depth questions of the
arbitrators concerning their individual presentations. |
| |
|
| |
HOW ARBITRATORS MAKE DECISIONS
|
| |
·
Panel discussion by arbitrators where they share their
perspectives on how they resolve issues of disputed facts, determined
credibility, review discipline, interpret contracts and determine
remedies. |
| |
·
Question and answer session by students. |
| |
|
| |
COURSE CONCLUDES
|